Posted 3:38pm on Sat 2 December 2006
- Posts: 26,252
Sonic has been on a slippery slope for years and SEGA has done nothing about it, and this has culminated in what can only be described as a complete disaster.
Posted 3:38pm on Sat 2 December 2006
you people are slating this game because it is 3d well yes fine the first three 3d sonic yes i agree not very good but this one is great it has great graphics and good game play and cool sound most of my mates have this game and they dont like it because its hard but they love every think else about it if you what 2d sonic download it form the net or the nintendo wii this sonic is the new stepping stone for sonic team keep it up
Posted 2:28pm on Wed 6 December 2006
- Posts: 3
I agree with soulfly1983. Of course, if this were a Nintendo game, it would have a much different review and score.
Posted 3:55pm on Wed 6 December 2006
- Posts: 1,614
No it wouldn't have. If Nintendo had released the exact same game it would have received the exact same score as Sonic was awarded.
Posted 6:36pm on Thu 14 December 2006
This game isn't that bad. I'll admit that the voice acting and the adventure parts are simply embarrassing, but when you're playing the action levels, its all forgotten. The game's beautiful and its as fast (and difficult) as the original 2D games. Maybe the next one will improve and there will finally be a Sonic that heralds him into the new age like Mario 64 did for the Italian.
Posted 12:43am on Fri 11 May 2007
Give the game a break. I have Sonic Heroes on PC and that works fine and in 3d.. How many 2d Sonic games have been released?? Getting a new system such as 3d to work right will take time, effort and hard work to get rid of the problems. Any game that can be walked through in a couple of hours doesn't present much of a challenge. I'd rather play a game that presents a challenge and takes a bit of time to master than one I had played in a matter of a few hours flat.
Posted 4:46pm on Sat 16 February 2008
Why are you putting down Sega? They have been working with sonic games for 16 years. If Nintendo made this game, would you do the same?
Posted 1:13pm on Sun 4 May 2008
- Posts: 7
you guys are too strict with games, this is one of the best sonic games i have ever played. this is not a fair score or reveiw :(. if you haad something that had us vote for what the score should be games wouldhave a much better chance
Posted 8:18am on Sun 15 June 2008
Wow, how in the world could you think this is even close to the best damn sonic? I agree that they were too strict with the sonic adventure games, but this is THE WORST SONIC GAME IN THE HISTORY OF SEGA! And coming in a close second is Sonic Heros.
This freaking game kills you for no apparent reason so many times, that you'd think the point of the game is to kill yourself. Everyone is way too slow ,(except in the speed stages, which have no control and are too damn fast) and some of the character movements are downright awful, I mean, just look at shadow from the side when he runs. The freaking upgrades are just stupid, and make you have to do those 10 minute quests, when the actual quest only takes a minute because of the unbearable load time, I mean, just what exactly are they loading? You don't even want to get me started on the whole Elise and sonic thing. I bet that the funnest part of the game was the boss battles, as they were the only exciting parts of the damn game!And they weren't even all that fun!
At least sonic adventures 1 and 2 were actually fun. Sonic the hedgehog 2006 seems more like a hassle and torture method than anything else. The game doesn't even deserve the title entertainment.
Posted 1:52am on Fri 6 March 2009