Posted at 11:23am on Wed 25 June 2008 |
|---|
VG_Staff- Posts: 18,022
| Is prepared to wait in order to build anticipation for the sequel.
Read Article |
Posted at 11:23am on Wed 25 June 2008 |
|---|
LeeMc- Posts: 1
| I didnt think the original was that great because of the very long cutscenes that you cant skip. Hopefullly that will be fixed and maybe a longer story with more re-play value |
Posted at 3:15am on Wed 2 July 2008 |
|---|
random935-2-5
| quality titles that last and don't get boring. I really looking forward to Prince of Persia, though. |
Posted at 9:59am on Mon 7 July 2008 |
|---|
Tugs- Posts: 17
| Higher quality. I'll wait an extra three years, so long as it's WORTH it. |
Posted at 11:08am on Mon 14 July 2008 |
|---|
Jayson
| I reckon wait. But not 3 years. Thats a bit long, people would get bored of waiting and not even bother. But someting like 1 and a half years or 2 is a good time to wait. Especially if you are going to make a third Assassins Creed.
Make the game longer, and have either shorter cutscenes or make them interesting. |
Posted at 1:00pm on Wed 27 August 2008 |
|---|
Osama
| No longer than 2 yeas, Why?,
look at Gears of war 2: Major improvement high quality graphics better than the first one, and brand new gameplay with just 2 years . |
Posted at 1:18pm on Wed 27 August 2008 |
|---|
xboxlive- Posts: 4,795
| i dont think any game should be rushed onto the market if you ask me. |
Posted at 11:06pm on Sat 30 August 2008 |
|---|
dave
| if there is to be a third assassin's creed why wait so long for the second? if the third takes 3 years to make then that's a total of 6 years, by then all interest will be lost because you have managed to out live the target audience. ok i want a decent quality but if you can't give it on a decent time-scale maybe rethink making sequels to games. |
